Re: [Diversity] 'Paywall, ' IETF self-sufficiency, increasing participation (was Re: Remote participation fees)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/03/2015 15:04, Pranesh Prakash wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> [2015-03-001 14:15:05
> +1300]:
>> Additionally, the IETF interprets each person's input as individual,
>> whether it is or it isn't. That in itself is quite effective in
>> disenfranchising employers.
>
> Is there an RFC that states this?

The fact that we participate as individuals is documented in BCP 95 (RFC
3935).
The way we evaluate consensus is discussed (informationally) in RFC 7282.

If the input is individuals effort then output is individuals effort, very simple model, so its the groups name which counts. IMHO we may need to amend that RFC3935 because group-participation is not only input-IETF but also output-IETF, why the output of IETF includes companies names within RFCs??? Did this RFC ignore participation in the IETF output?? The IETF needs to clarify its output as individual, so that it is only individuals effort output and not company effort involved. I tried to see that exclusion but did not find that. Therefore, that RFC3935/7282 does not exclude companies support from the interpretation of its output. 

AB


 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]