IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Need Confirmation and Clarification- LDAP: Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms (RFC 4513)
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-22.txt
- RE: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Slim -- Selection of Language for Internet Media
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Last Call: <draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-15.txt> (IPP over HTTPS Transport Binding and 'ipps' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-09.txt
- Personal note re: an IPR disclosure
- Bar BoF meeting for secauth on 13 Nov at 7 PM - Gentle reminder
- Re: Good idea, but, as the saying goes, no cigar (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Attending IETF 91 Remotely)
- Re: Good idea, but, as the saying goes, no cigar
- From: Meetecho IETF support
- Good idea, but, as the saying goes, no cigar (was: Re: [Recentattendees] Attending IETF 91 Remotely)
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-22.txt
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-22.txt
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re[2]: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- RE: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- RE: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Sunday tutorials, newcomers, and remote participants
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- on recurring favourite locations for November IETF meetings
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- IETF 91 - Agenda Changes
- RE: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- RE: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- IETF 91 - Online Pre-Meeting Registration Deadline at 17:00 HAST Friday, November 7
- Last Call comments draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-info-22.txt
- NOMCOM 2014 - feedback and office hours
- IETF Journal - latest issue now available
- Reappointment of Lars Eggert as IRTF Chair
- IETF 91 - Registration Cancellation Cutoff Monday, November 3rd
- RFC Editor Digital Object Identifiers Project
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- RFP: RFC Editor Website Revamp
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Last Call: <draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-15.txt> (IPP over HTTPS Transport Binding and 'ipps' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Survey on Smart Data Pricing for Affordable Internet access
- From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- RE: 802.11a preamble
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: 802.11a preamble
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF-91 hot topics
- Re: [91all] IETF-91 hot topics
- 802.11a preamble
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-optimization-03.txt> (An Optimization for the MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)) to Proposed Standard
- IETF-91 hot topics
- IETF 91 - Agenda Changes
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04.txt
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-15.txt> (IPP over HTTPS Transport Binding and 'ipps' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 91 - Early Bird Registration Deadline Friday, October 31
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-payload-g7110-03
- From: Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-payload-g7110-03
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: How to attend interim meetings
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-aes-gcm-14
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-11
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05.txt> (Opportunistic Security: Some Protection Most of the Time) to Informational RFC
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt> (Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IAOC] suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: How to attend interim meetings
- Re: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt> (Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service) to Proposed Standard
- Re: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
- RE: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib-11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05.txt> (Opportunistic Security: Some Protection Most of the Time) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: earlier registration, suggestion for the next IETFs
- IETF 91 Agenda Change
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt> (Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-05.txt> (Opportunistic Security: Some Protection Most of the Time) to Informational RFC
- ISOC@IETF 91 Briefing Panel
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- DEADLINE ON FRIDAY! Call for Nominations: 2015 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP)
- How to attend interim meetings
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: suggestion for the next IETFs
- Re: suggestion for the next IETFs
- suggestion for the next IETFs
- Reappointment of Nevil Brownlee as Independent Submission Editor
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Internet Architecture Document
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-00.txt
- Re: Adapting/adopting RFC 7154 for International Conference on Open Repositories
- RE: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mptcp-attacks-02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 91 - Thursday Lunch Speaker Series
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-deng-chinese-names-02.txt
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- From: Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: Technological tizzies
- Technological tizzies
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt> (The "safe" HTTP Preference) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-murdock-nato-nid-02.txt> (URN Namespace for NATO) to Informational RFC
- IETF 91 - Meeting and Social Event Information
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Volunteer Needed for ICANN Technical Liaison Group
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-payload-g7110-03
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-13.txt> (HTTP usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- From: lizho.jin@xxxxxxxxx
- RE: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- RE: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- RE: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- *** Final Reminder: "Nerds in Paradise" T-shirt order window closes soon!
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-13.txt> (HTTP usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- From: lizho.jin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [OPS-DIR] [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-10.txt> (JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-rdap-query-15.txt> (Registration Data Access Protocol Query Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- RE: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- From: Burleigh, Scott C (312B)
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- RE: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: Budget and fees for 2015
- Re: proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
- Re: Call for Feedback on the current IRTF Chair
- Re: Budget and fees for 2015
- Re: Budget and fees for 2015
- Budget and fees for 2015
- *** Reminder and update "Nerds in Paradise" T-shirts ***
- IETF 91 Final Agenda
- Area restructuring, and the open App AD position
- Call for Feedback on the current IRTF Chair
- Genart LC review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-13.txt> (HTTP usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: [weirds] Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-13.txt> (HTTP usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Software and Configuration Management Was: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Software and Configuration Management Was: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-06
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: "Jabber Scribe" howto
- Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-06
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-09
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-authres-ptypes-registry-04
- IETF 91 - Social Tickets Now Available!
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt> (Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service) to Proposed Standard
- My Questionair
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- "Jabber Scribe" howto
- From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Softwires] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-06
- Nerds in Paradise: Special Commemorative T-shirt
- Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Internet Architecture Document
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Internet Architecture Document
- Re: Internet Architecture Document
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07
- Re: Internet Architecture Document
- Re: Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07
- RE: Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- Re: Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- Internet Architecture Document
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-6man-why64-06
- Re: Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Thoughts triggered by "Proposed IESG structure change"
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Re: Media type for PGP message?
- Media type for PGP message?
- Re: NOMCOM 2014 - nominations extended for RAI, OAM, TSV and INT - Oct 20
- RE: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-4rd-08.txt> (IPv4 Residual Deployment via IPv6 - a Stateless Solution (4rd)) to Experimental RFC
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6-10
- NOMCOM 2014 - nominations extended for RAI, OAM, TSV and INT - Oct 20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Applied Networking Research Prize 2014 presentation s at IETF-91
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- IETF 91 Preliminary Agenda
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- NOMCOM 2014 - LAST CALL for Nominations - TODAY
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tram-alpn-06.txt> (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) labels for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Usages) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration and Overflow Hotel Information
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tram-alpn-06.txt> (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) labels for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Usages) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 91 - Registration and Overflow Hotel Information
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-tram-alpn-06.txt> (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) labels for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Usages) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- RE: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-authres-ptypes-registry-04
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tram-alpn-06
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- From: Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers 2015
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Re: Proposed IESG structure change
- Proposed IESG structure change
- No Technical Plenary Topic at IETF 91
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-lmap-use-cases-04
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- RE: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- RE: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Facts and draft-state information (was Re: Protocol Action: 'Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF' to Proposed Standard (draft-kyzivat-case-sensitive-abnf-02.txt)
- Re: WG Review: Distributed Mobility Management (dmm)
- Re: WG Review: Distributed Mobility Management (dmm)
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: Rtg-yang-coord
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-13.txt> (An Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- RE: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Re: Ever-more-steep barriers
- Ever-more-steep barriers (was: IETF registration fee increase from 2015)
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Local Cloud Node
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-05
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Local Cloud Node
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fermat 4 Standard
- Re: put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Fermat 4 Standard
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Fermat 4 Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Last Call comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-04
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- RE: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Last Call: <draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08.txt> (Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs) to Best Current Practice
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- RE: put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- put the paypal donation button in every rfc?
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
- RE: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-10
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Gen-ART LC review for draft-ietf-roll-security-threats-10
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-05
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis-05
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07.txt
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- RE: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Re: [Dart] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07.txt,
- IETF registration fee increase from 2015
- RE: [jose] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- If you edit the BOF wiki, please "edit this page"!
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Re: email standards
- FROM or PAID international CLI
- Lawsuit Names ISOC & IETF: Glassey v. MicroSemi Inc.
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- RE: History behind RFC numbers
- Re: History behind RFC numbers
- History behind RFC numbers
- Genart LC review: draft-ietf-6man-why64-05
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-33
- Five softwires documents last called today.
- Re: [Softwires] Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-4rd-08.txt> (IPv4 Residual Deployment via IPv6 - a Stateless Solution (4rd)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: IETF web site behind CloudFlare
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-31
- JOSE -33 and JWT -27 drafts addressing Stephen Kent's JWK comments
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
- Re: Data on internet drafts/year?
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]