On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 11:04:55AM -0500, John C Klensin wrote: > Let's just recognize that making rules retroactive to a 40+ year > old spec is not likely to be fruitful. [...] +1. Especially given how useful RFC 20 is. Let's demonstrate agility and pragmatism here. Promote RFC 20 after a small effort to ascertain the RFC-Editor's current electronic version's faithfulness to such "original" paper copies as might be found. Or even *without* such an effort: publish any errors found later as errata and call it a day. Nico --