Re: RFC 20 status change last call: References to appendices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 11:04:55AM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
> Let's just recognize that making rules retroactive to a 40+ year
> old spec is not likely to be fruitful.  [...]

+1.  Especially given how useful RFC 20 is.

Let's demonstrate agility and pragmatism here.  Promote RFC 20 after a
small effort to ascertain the RFC-Editor's current electronic version's
faithfulness to such "original" paper copies as might be found.  Or even
*without* such an effort: publish any errors found later as errata and
call it a day.

Nico
-- 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]