Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 19:19:34 -0500
Cc: John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>, IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <54833B14.7010104@cs.tcd.ie>

> PS: If Barry or anyone else wants to do this instead that's
> fine by me.

I already have; the status-change document is in Last Call Requested state.

Barry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: Julian Reschke

References:
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: Stephen Farrell

Prev by Date: Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
Next by Date: Re: DNS64, DANE and DPRIV
Previous by thread: Re: Status of RFC 20
Next by thread: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]