Re: Status of RFC 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of RFC 20
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 16:47:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAMm+LwhkLd-ZceXV2cXk6kqiF7Eo=9b47m6ghtThjCAo4TiNHw@mail.gmail.com> (Phillip Hallam-Baker's message of "Sun, 7 Dec 2014 09:06:16 -0500")
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> it would
> be more appropriate to reformat RFC20 in the new presentation format.

Done:-)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc20.txt.pdf

Grüße, Carsten

References:
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker

Prev by Date: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
Next by Date: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Previous by thread: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
Next by thread: Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]