Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why did you settle on a proposed name for the combined upper-layers
> area that implies it will be sleeping?
Good question.
I figured "NetAPP" was taken :-)
Here is perhaps the worst alternative I can think of:
Networked Applications and Transport (NAT).
and yet...
I too would like a more inspired name.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature