On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Nico Williams wrote: >On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Nico Williams wrote: >>>Better not even think about saying anything about normalization, >>>right? PKCS#11 nowadays supports UTF-8 for the strings we care about, >>>but says nothing about normalization. I suppose you could say that >>>matching should be (lowercase) normalization-insensitive. In practice >>>it will never matter (which is why the lowercase). >> >> hi Nico, I assume you talk about case normalization now. I >> also agree we need not to say anything about it - and we don't aside >> from "case normalization" as defined in 6.2.2.1 of RFC 3986 where only >> the following sections are relevant to us: > >No, I meant Unicode normalization. It's a messy business. Better say >nothing, because I think the thing to do is obvious enough, but if we >must say anything, it's that the various strings (e.g., token manuf) >are to be compared normalization-insensitively. yes, in that case I agree that we don't need to say anything. Thanks for bringing this up, Jan. -- Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@xxxxxxxxxx>