> On 9 dec 2014, at 06:11, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I received one off-list response that RFC3629 would be inappropriate > because Unicode is a versioned standard. But here we want a UTF, not > all of Unicode, and surely UTF-8 is stable. RFC3629 has no limitation based on Unicode version. The limitation is that it only defines UTF-8 for the UTF-16 accessible range, U+0000..U+10FFFF. Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail