On 2014/12/09 14:11, Nico Williams wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:03:33AM +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 9 dec 2014, at 04:37, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and add a suitable reference to UTF-8.
Oh, eh, RFC7159 lacked such a thing. At least this one should be
non-controversial: RFC3629. (Right? :)
Yes, correct.
I received one off-list response that RFC3629 would be inappropriate
because Unicode is a versioned standard. But here we want a UTF, not
all of Unicode, and surely UTF-8 is stable.
Yes indeed. Regards, Martin.