As a member of or sympathizer with various societies for bear
encouragement and preservation (black, brown, polar, Cub Scouts,
Teddy, Pooh, ... in no particular order), I find this name
really objectionable. From the description, "unbearerable"
might have been better, "betterbearer" certainly would have been.
"unbearable" should be reserved for April 1 RFCs and similar
work efforts :-)
I wonder if anyone has ever appealed a mailing list name.
unbearably yours,
john
--On Friday, December 05, 2014 11:18 -0800 IETF Secretariat
<ietf-secretariat@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
>
> List address: unbearable@xxxxxxxx
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/unbearable/
> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable
>
> Purpose:
>
> This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than
> bearer tokens (e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.) for web
> applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on
> preventing security token export and replay attacks.