>>>>> DNS64 is not the only solution for a ISP to go IPv6 only. >>>> 64 was motivated by the need for a 6-only *enterprise* >>> >>> And DNS64 requires NAT in the core and a fork lift upgrade of the >>> CPE to support IPv6. >> >> no. let's try reading what i said again. i requires nat at the edge of >> the V6-ONLY ENTERPRISE. considering the enterprise is v6-only and >> trying to talk to a v4 world, address translation is inevitable. > > Yet we have ISPs trying to use / contemplating using DNS64. we have isps using nat4444, ds-blight, ..., kids shooting crack, imperialists bombing people half a plaet away. so? > DS-Lite in the enterprise would require see crack above randy