On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 01:20:32PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: > approach the design of changes with caution -- starting with some > modesty about expected benefits -- and make on-going evaluations, to > look for those consequences and consider tweaks. I think that's right, and it's again a reason that I prefer Nico's approach -- not because I think it will be simpler; but rather because, since it is such a departure, nobody will be tempted to think that it'll get everything right in one pass. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx