Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/12/2014 23:24, Mark Andrews wrote:

If a consumer device does not support IPv6 as well as IPv4 it should
be sent back to the manufacture / supplier as "not fit for purpose"
and a full refund should be requested.  It shouldn't cost the
consumer anything other than some time to get their devices fixed.

Whether that makes sense depends on the rest of the selection
criteria. The IPv6 alternatives might well be insufficient in some
other important characteristic.

Stewart






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]