Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard,

> On 27 November, I requested that the co-chairs provide a justification for
> the conclusion that rough consensus has been achieved, see:
> 
>  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01402.html
> 
> The requested justification has not yet been provided.

Calling the consensus is a judgment call. For what it is worth, I have been 
quite satisfied with the chairs and the document shepherd reading the 
opinions of the group. Their thoughts have been discussed in the thread
“draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response moving to next step”, see the thread
beginning at 

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01401.html

See in particular this e-mail:

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01406.html

as well as the shepherd writeup:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/shepherdwriteup/

Also, for information, the IESG has not yet considered this draft. But they 
will. Right now it's in IETF last call, the outcome of which will first be 
evaluated by the responsible AD, in this case me. And then by the IESG 
as a whole. At that point the IESG will determine if there have been any 
process or other issues that need consideration or action.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]