>> The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering >> Group WG (iesg) > > Does this mean that the IESG received a request from themselves? In that > case, couldn't they just write "the IESG plans to..."? Or is this a mistake? A mistake; the tools generated that automatically, for some reason, and I didn't notice it until after it was sent out. The second status-change, which Ted Lemon generated later the same day didn't have that silliness. Maybe our tools like Ted more than they like me. Waddyagonnado? > P.S.: I approve of the reclassification itself. Thanks, Martin; that's helpful. Barry