This is the second forwarded message. Begin forwarded message: > From: "Richard Hill" <rhill@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [Ianaplan] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC > Date: 11 Dec 2014 06:39:11 EST > To: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx, iesg@xxxxxxxx > Reply-To: rhill@xxxxxxxxx > > Dear Jari, > > Thank you for this. I do understand the consensus call is a judgement call. > But, as I understand RFC 7282, a justification should be provided for the > judgement call. And that is what I am requesting. > > Regarding the "sheperd writeup", I have requested some changes, see: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01415.html > > Regarding the IESG, that body requested comments, and that is why I > submitted my comments to the IETF list. > > Best, > Richard > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: mercredi, 10. décembre 2014 11:28 >> To: rhill@xxxxxxxxx >> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; iesg@xxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Last Call: >> <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the >> Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol >> parameters registries) to Informational RFC >> >> >> Richard, >> >>> On 27 November, I requested that the co-chairs provide a >> justification for >>> the conclusion that rough consensus has been achieved, see: >>> >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01402.html >>> >>> The requested justification has not yet been provided. >> >> Calling the consensus is a judgment call. For what it is worth, I >> have been >> quite satisfied with the chairs and the document shepherd reading the >> opinions of the group. Their thoughts have been discussed in the thread >> “draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response moving to next step”, see the thread >> beginning at >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01401.html >> >> See in particular this e-mail: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/current/msg01406.html >> >> as well as the shepherd writeup: >> >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response/shepherdwr > iteup/ > > Also, for information, the IESG has not yet considered this draft. But they > will. Right now it's in IETF last call, the outcome of which will first be > evaluated by the responsible AD, in this case me. And then by the IESG > as a whole. At that point the IESG will determine if there have been any > process or other issues that need consideration or action. > > Jari > >