John, You are right, I went a bit too far. I hope I didn't offend anyone. When I read the draft and saw the list of things proposed for Secretary, it was all of the things that I have do as a w.g. chair. I don't think we need to formalize the Secretary role as this draft does. If there are working groups where the chairs want and need this, they are free to do so. Bob On Dec 8, 2014, at 3:57 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --On Monday, December 08, 2014 11:53 +0200 Bob Hinden > <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> i also agree with your suspicion that this is an attept to >>> patch a chairing problem. one suspects possible iesg >>> unwillingness to bite bullets. > >> I agree. The list of tasks assigned in this draft to the >> secretary should be done by the w.g. chairs. If they can't do >> these tasks, then they shouldn't be chairs. > > Bob, while I agree with Melinda's concern and Randy's > bullet-biting one, I don't think we should go quite as far as > "...shouldn't be chairs". We apparently do have a shortage of > people who will (or can) take on IETF leadership roles at a > variety of levels. If someone can take on a Chair role, retain > responsibility and accountability, but spread the work around, I > think we should generally be in favor of that. Both Secretary > roles and less personally time-consuming Chair roles can be > important tools for leadership development and training -- we do > too little of that, to, IMO, our considerable peril. > > I don't think we want anything that looks like a set of rules > that say "there shall be Secretaries" or "the Secretary job > description is...". Equally, I don't think we want anything > that says "there should not be Secretaries" or "Secretaries must > not get any of the following responsibilities...". Instead... > > (1) We leave 2418 alone. > > (2) We continue doing what we have done in the IETF for as long > as I can remember: we give WG Chairs a lot of discretion about > how they get their work done and assume that the limits on that > discretion can, and should, be worked out between Chair and AD > on a case-by-case basis. > > (3) We invite the authors of this draft, and others who are > interested, to extract the "if you are asked to do this task, > this is advice about how to do it" material from the draft and > add it to the WG Chair wiki, the Tao, or other sources of > general guidance, as may be appropriate. > > john >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail