That's an ad-hominem argument that has no bearing on the current proposal. Though, if I was paying better attention, I'd have complained about those moves being unnecessary too. L. I still regret not objecting to BEEP going standards-track. Who uses it? On 4 Dec 2014, at 14:06, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> We have effectively gotten to the point of depletion of IPV4 addresses, and the world has not come to an end. I don't see any need to reclassify this RFC as a standard and think doing so would cause confusion in the community and be harmful to the Internet. > > If you think this shouldn't be a standard, why didn't you object when MAP-E, MAP-T and Lightweight 4over6 were last-called? >