Hi Martin, Thanks for the detailed email and the update. I think you've done a good job of addressing the many points that were raised. I've waited a while to see whether anyone wanted to comment on your changes, for example to say that they don't address their concerns. But no email on the subject. I will put the document in front of the IESG on the 18 December telechat. That gives you all a little longer to express any further concerns. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: iesg [mailto:iesg-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux > Sent: 12 November 2014 07:29 > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Cc: IETF WG Chairs > Subject: Reply to LC comments on draft-secretaries-good-practices-06 > > All, > > thank you for your reviews and comments on > draft-secretaries-good-practices-06. > Sorry for the delayed response. > > Summarizing the comments: > > * We noticed some opposition to moving this document as a BCP updating > RFC 2418. > We have decided no to progress it as such. We have thus removed the > normative section (Section 2.), changed the intended status to > Informational, removed the update to RFC 2418 in the header and > Abstract, and have moved RFC 2418 as an Informative Reference. > > * We understood some clarifications were needed to more precisely > position the content of this document with regards to WG chairs > responsibilities. > * We also understood that some clarifications were needed with regards > to the relevancy of WG Secretaries, as well a who has responsibility > over their appointment and the delegation. > There were bits and pieces of text covering some of these points. Text > was also missing. We have regrouped all the relevant text elements under > a new section (Applicability Statement) with the objective of clarifying > the blurry points. > > * In response to specific comments we have also clarified the elements > pertaining to access to tools. > > * Finally, we have taken into account a good number of rewording > suggestions. > > I am ready to go through each comment that was made, if desired. > > We have published a new version of the draft capturing all that. > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-secretaries-good-practices-07 > > Thank you > > -m