Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:50:53AM +1100, Manger, James wrote:
> >With John Cowan's change ("an ASCII Line Feed character (0x1E)"
> >instead of "an ASCII Record Separator (0x1E)"), that would indeed be
> >clearer.
> 
> Please no. That would give an even worse mix of UTF-8 and ASCII, bytes
> and characters, in the 1 sentence.

Well, I just submitted -11 :(

But I don't think it's a problem, really.  UTF-8 is a superset of ASCII.

> P.S. The spec still defines the same ABNF names twice (RS,
> JSON-sequence): once as bytes; once as Unicode scalars. Yuck. Just
> give them different names.

They're two different sets of rules, yes.  If people want me to, I'll
rename one of them.

Nico
-- 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]