John, On 12/3/14, 6:14 PM, John Levine wrote: > It sounds like we want the same thing here, but when I read the draft, > I don't see it actually saying that if there's a new IANA operator, we > need a new equally good contract. That seems to me to be worth making > explicit. I think that's a fine suggestion. The discussions and conclusions of the WG, so far as I can tell, were exclusively focused on the ICANN/NTIA relationship, and your suggestion reinforces the conclusion by inference (we CAN change should the need arise) and it gives people a view as to how we would see to the continuity of the service. Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature