On 09/12/2014 12:41, Adrian Farrel wrote: >>> Section 6: >>> Nevertheless, while the WG Chairs may delegate a number of tasks to >>> the Secretary, they maintain the overall responsibility and >>> accountability over the WG and the decisions and actions that are >>> taken. >> Which is good stuff, like most of the content. I think the >> argument is not about the quality of the draft, but about >> whether it needs to be a BCP. > > If only the "argument" was founded on reading the draft! No, founded on reading the subject line of the Last Call message. It seems that I missed a "downgrade" of the Last Call. I don't object to this as Informational. Brian > > Network Working Group M. Vigoureux > Internet Draft Alcatel-Lucent > Intended status: Informational D. King > Expires: May 2015 Old Dog Consulting > C. Pignataro > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > November 11, 2014 > > IETF Working Groups' Secretaries > draft-secretaries-good-practices-07 > > Who is currently asking for this to be a BCP? > And why are we having that "argument"? > > Adrian > > >