> > Section 6:
> > Nevertheless, while the WG Chairs may delegate a number of tasks to
> > the Secretary, they maintain the overall responsibility and
> > accountability over the WG and the decisions and actions that are
> > taken.
>
> Which is good stuff, like most of the content. I think the
> argument is not about the quality of the draft, but about
> whether it needs to be a BCP.
If only the "argument" was founded on reading the draft!
Network Working Group M. Vigoureux
Internet Draft Alcatel-Lucent
Intended status: Informational D. King
Expires: May 2015 Old Dog Consulting
C. Pignataro
Cisco Systems, Inc.
November 11, 2014
IETF Working Groups' Secretaries
draft-secretaries-good-practices-07
Who is currently asking for this to be a BCP?
And why are we having that "argument"?
Adrian