Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Doug Royer <douglasroyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So the expectation is that ISP's will replace your NAT/router with one that meets this specification? Why would they just not replace it with a IPv6 one? I still see no time
> to implement gain if this is the plan.

A+P is available in OpenWRT.   And you aren't listening: I just said that this makes the most sense in a dual stack environment.   Dual stack means IPv4+IPv6.   In an A+P deployment, the expectation is that you get better service over IPv6, but still need some residual support for IPv4, for which A+P is adequate.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]