Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
From: Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:06:13 -0600
Cc: "General Area Review Team \(gen-art@xxxxxxxx\)" <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "ops-dir@xxxxxxxx" <ops-dir@xxxxxxxx>, "json@xxxxxxxx" <json@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACweHNAtbxVOsnGAPsRJQD=640hzvpxYh5L34kZYQjsOO6H8HA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:52:22AM +1000, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> On 10 December 2014 at 10:49, Nico Williams <nico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > (yes, I think this should be a 'should', not a 'SHOULD').
> 
> Not an 'ought to'?

I'll take that.

References:
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Nico Williams
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Nico Williams
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
  - From: Matthew Kerwin

Prev by Date: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Next by Date: RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Previous by thread: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Next by thread: RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]