On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:23:02AM +0100, Jaroslav Imrich wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Jan Pechanec <jan.pechanec@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > >I think so. This is really for Jan to answer. Maybe the Solaris > > >libpkcs11 should just ensure a meaningful (stable and distinct) slot > > >label. If that could be done then slot-id could be excluded here. > > > > > >Jan? > > > > for example, metaslot on Solaris is always 0 so slot-id=0 > > would be reliable there to use to access the soft token. Jan. > > And there is no other URI that could identify that slot without the slot-id > attribute? i.e. pkcs11:slot-description=metaslot I would think so. Maybe Jan misunderstood my question; he certainly didn't answer it. Nico --