Hi Albert, >
We have posted an updated version of draft-lisp-introduction hopefully addressing all the comments besides UDP Zero. I’ve scanned the diff wrt the -11 version, and it does look like all the comments have been addressed besides the one on UDP zero checksums for IPv6. I’m going to walk
away from that comment, as there is some rationale for that design decision in the existing draft text, and moreover, the primary responsibility for that explanation falls on the LISP protocol RFCs that have already been approved by the IESG. Hence, I think this -12 version of the introduction draft is good to go. Thank you to you and the other authors for addressing the comments in a thorough fashion and for
doing so even though they arrived after the conclusion of IETF Last Call on this draft. Regards, From: Albert Cabellos [mailto:albert.cabellos@xxxxxxxxx]
Hi all We have posted an updated version of draft-lisp-introduction hopefully addressing all the comments besides UDP Zero. Please let us know if this is not the case. Kind Regards Albert ---------- Forwarded message ---------- |