On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Philip,
Or because weekly meetings are more efficient.Is there really a demand for interim meetings that cannot be supported in IETF regular meetings? We meet 3 times a year, why isn't that enough? I don't know of any W3C working group meeting more than three times a year.
Rather than trying to pile requirements onto interim meetings, can we work out a way to accommodate these needs in regular meetings?
I would like to suggest we go a stage further and change the way the IETF meetings work.
People are having interim meetings because a one or two day meeting on one topic is a lot more productive than an IETF WG session.
I consider weekly con-calls a different class. But again, they are often useful for certain types of WG.