Cool! Some quick feedback: * you should explicitly accommodate target attributes (i.e., extension fields) * 'rev' was only included in 5988 for backwards compatibility with some fairly esoteric use cases; don't think it's necessary or good here. * you need to specify how to determine the context of the link (using RFC5988 terminology). Cheers, > On 27 Feb 2015, at 3:25 am, Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The document effectively gives a "type" for the URI by associating a value from the ENUM service registry. While that makes sense from the standpoint of ENUM, if this mechanism is truly generic to *all* URIs, it seems to me that it'd be much more sensible to use the typing system already in place for URIs -- link relations <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988>. > > Such a good idea that there is already a draft with just such an approach: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-link-rr/ > > -andy -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/