Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:35:29PM -0500, John C Klensin wrote:

> >> > but we can prevent downgrade attacks from succeeding.
> > 
> > If the MTA implements opportunistic DANE TLS, and usable TLSA
> > records *are* published, then it MUST use STARTTLS and
> > authenticate the peer via said TLSA records.
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-14#section-2.2
> 
> Victor,

[ Well known details elided. ]

> Neither DNSSEC nor DANE prevent or detect
> those attacks.  They may actually be harmful if they give the
> user a false sense of security.

Since the user is not around for MTA-to-MTA SMTP transmission there
is no opportunity for any false sense of security.  So I object to
a characterization of improved hop by hop transport security as
"harmful".  This is not the thread to deep dive into that.

-- 
	Viktor.





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]