Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I really don't think that relaxing nomcom membership rules is an
> effective way to address our (very real) leadership diversity
> issue. That being said diversity is clearly of value for the nomcom
> itself, in addition to the value for our leadership bodies. I have no
> idea whether the proposed rules would actually qualify a more diverse
> set of people. Larger, yes. More diverse? Maybe. But given that all
> of these rules are very rough approximations for what we need, I am
> concerned that relaxing them without sufficient relationship to our
> needs has a too high a probability of making things worse in important
> ways.
If we can find a way to get the registration database imported into the
datatracker, that would permit one to run some experiments. We need that
data, because we need to know if someone is 3/5 qualified already.
> All of which is why I want to see a specific proposal. And why I have
> said that in the abstract I would like to see improvement.
I have written some specific ideas (close to, but not specific wording for
BCP10) on this thread. If that was insufficient for you to evaluate
conceptually (parameters can be tweaked); can you tell me in what form you
think it needs to be presented?
Or is this really a continuation of the above paragraph; and really you are
saying you'd like to be able apply the process against real data, and observe
the results? (running code)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature