Re: [lisp] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11 [B]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



They can be the same if the underlay provider wants to control overlay's group address allocation. 

Dino


> On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Black, David <david.black@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I don't care what terms are used - it just needs to be absolutely clear that
> the inner and outer multicast addresses are not the same and that mapping
> between them (which could take a number of forms) is involved.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farinacci@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 8:15 AM
>> To: Luigi Iannone
>> Cc: Black, David; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx; lisp@xxxxxxxx; Albert Cabellos; Damien
>> Saucez; ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [lisp] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11
>> 
>>> G-EID     =>  the EID multicast group G
>>> G-RLOC =>  the RLOC multicast group G
>> 
>> "inner and outer group addresses" have been used in various LISP multicast
>> documents.
>> 
>> Dino






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]