On 14/02/15 18:21, Mary Barnes wrote: > And, actually this is already happening with Meetecho. I think we ought forget about charging for remote attendance until remote attendance is much better. Remotely attending IETF-91 via meetecho was a good bit better than I expected but is nowhere near the point where we could charge. Let's make it work first, and then see how that affects attendance and then figure out charging models and not try do that backwards by starting to discuss charging models for something that doesn't yet exist. S.