+1 Ray > On Feb 14, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 14/02/15 18:21, Mary Barnes wrote: >> And, actually this is already happening with Meetecho. > > I think we ought forget about charging for remote attendance until > remote attendance is much better. Remotely attending IETF-91 via > meetecho was a good bit better than I expected but is nowhere near > the point where we could charge. Let's make it work first, and then > see how that affects attendance and then figure out charging models > and not try do that backwards by starting to discuss charging models > for something that doesn't yet exist. > > S. >