On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 27/02/2015 11:34, Lou Berger wrote: >> >> >> On 2/26/2015 5:23 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote: >>> Those subteams go off on their own for weeks at a time and iterate as needed. And they work without all of the overhead of a formal meeting. They may or may not discuss progress on the list until issues come up. >> >> There's nothing wrong/out of process with this. The key process >> requirement is that they do review & discuss changes with the WG at some >> point (which sometimes *is* sometimes a challenge to ensure that it >> happens), and certainly no later than when the changes are published. > > And *any* decision taken that way, right down to the choice to use binary > arithmetic, may be challenged and changed by the WG as a whole, and for > that matter by the IETF as a whole when it gets to Last Call. FWIW, that certainly wasn't the case for HTTP/2. The IETF is currently very flexible in how chairs are allowed to apply its processes. ....Roy