>> If that is something you want, this document is certainly not the >> place to do it. That's a protocol specification change, and this >> document is not altering the DNS protocol in any way. >> >> Best regards, > > Well reflecting back the bit isn't permitted and requiring that > such queries get answered are parts of the existing specification > which are not being followed. Requiring just these parts be correctly > followed will make future deployment easier. For what it is worth, I agree with Andrew that this document is not a protocol specification, and these other things belong elsewhere. And it seems you have a draft already, so… Jari
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail