On Mar 1, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps dropping the idea of imposing a fee for remote participants might help? Or not imposing a fee for non-financed individual participants? Or not imposing a fee for participants from MICs and LICs? I think everybody who's stated an opinion on this has said that there would be no fee or a small fee which could be waived for people who aren't being supported to attend. MIC/LIC status would certainly be a relevant factor.