> On Feb 25, 2015:6:28 PM, at 6:28 PM, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dean, > > I think the short answer to your question is yes. A more complete version > of that answer is available at: > https://communities.cisco.com/message/175254#175254 > > I have verified that you do not need to register with Cisco DevNet to view > the content within the community setup for the Hackathon: > https://communities.cisco.com/community/developer/ietf-hackathon > > You do need to login to post to it. This requirement could be relaxed, > thus allowing anonymous posts, but I don¹t view that as a particularly > good solution. A better solution would be to use IETF Infrastructure for this, or at least non-commercial like github. --Tom > > Cheers, > Charles > > > On 2/25/15, 3:15 PM, "Dean Bogdanovic" <deanb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> My biggest issue with this hackathon is requirement to register with >> Cisco DevNet. This tells me it is a corporate event, not an IETF event >> and am asking if Cisco DevNet org is trying to increase its membership. >> >> And +1 to Melinda's email >> >> On Feb 25, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>>> On Feb 25, 2015:4:03 PM, at 4:03 PM, Melinda Shore >>>> <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2/25/15 11:57 AM, James Gannon wrote: >>>>> Am I the only one who think that a rebranding on this might be the >>>>> easiest solution for everyone? >>>> >>>> I think it's by far the best solution. The expectation that you'd >>>> need a Cisco login and visit a Cisco web page to see responses to >>>> questions raised on the IETF mailing list seems unreasonable to me. >>>> >>>> If it's an IETF event, move the "community" page to an IETF resource. >>>> We've got multiple wikis, and I really can't imagine who thought it >>>> was a better idea to use an access-controlled Cisco one. >>>> >>>> In the meantime, thanks to Charles for posting a little more >>>> information to the mailing list. >>>> >>>> Melinda >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >