Dave,
On 2015-02-11 21:44, Dave Crocker wrote:
Swap the focus. Rather than seeking to characterize the clueless, let's
characterize folk who are much more likely to be clueful:
Would be a blessing :)
Ensure that at least a portion of the Nomcom has contributed in
formal, documented way. AD, Chair, author.. whatever set of activities
we feel makes it likely they will have clue.
I guess I'm old-time minded here, what is wrong with 3 meetings out
of 5, and if you want co-authored document.
As for Loa's question about why someone who hasn't done real IETF work
would want to volunteer, the answer is politics and/or ego. They or
their company might want to hold sway over nomcom or the person might
just want to add this to their resume.
With due respect - I don't think this is how it work, do we have any
running code? Our rules so far has not stopped anyone form paying and
register, sit at the back of a a couple of wg meetings and three IETF
meetings later drop his/her name into the hat. But has it happened?
/Loa
--
Loa Andersson email: loa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert loa@xxxxx
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64