On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:43:32AM +0530, Pranesh Prakash wrote: > But because it enables you to participate more steadily in the IETF than > someone who is not similarly funded. That ability to participate has all > manners of implications, including the ability to be chair of WGs, etc. Yes, of course. The fact that I grew up in a middle-class suburb in Canada as opposed to an Native Canadian Reservation means that my education was better funded too. And the fact that I make a pretty good salary and live (though reluctantly) in a low-crime town in New England instead of struggling to keep out of the way of civil war in Syria also gives me such abilities. I'm not sure what you're suggesting one could do about all of this. To bring this back to the topic at hand: currently, remote partipation in IETF meetings is free, with the cost that such participation doesn't get counted for Nomcom eligibility. There've been suggestions that we ought to figure out ways of allowing such remote participation to count at least in some measure, but if we're going to do that then it seems only fair that some of the burden of remote-attendance support be shared by those remote participants, which would mean that participation costs would actually go up for such participants. It therefore seems to me that the best we can do in these cases as participants is to be aware of the gaps in participation and attempt to reflect the interests of those people too. Do you have an alternative suggestion? Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx