On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/24/2015 9:57 AM, Stuart Cheshire wrote: >> I realize that these things are often not planned a long way in >> advance, but for future events, as much notice as possible would be >> helpful. >> >> It’s now less than four weeks to the IETF meeting, and many of us >> have (non-refundable) flights already booked. > > > +1 > > Very short notice is pretty common for these special activities > surrounding the IETF. > > It would be worth getting some agreement on a reasonable deadline for > announcing them. One month ain't it. Yup, fully agree, one month is not long enough. Whoever[0] is organizing this could have done better / gotten it organized earlier --- however, I'm really glad that someone has actually bothered organizing such a thing. If it turns out to be useful, perhaps it will be announced earlier in the future. We kvetch about lack of running code, missing implementations, etc - let's not also kvetch too much when someone tries to organize something to improve the situation. W [0]: Apparently cisco... > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf