Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All,


Due to a mistake from my side, the new version I have been hacking in based on comments coming back during the still open last call was posted the other day. I am sorry for that and my apologies for people being confused.

It was my intention "only" to describe here what I have found so far in comments, so let me summarize in no specific order:

- It is confusing to have a full section called "examples" and then only have one example.

- The registries that existed when the draft was first posted was (only) the ENUM registry, while now we also have a registry for SRV prefixes, and this draft can and should reference both

- The example(s) given should because the draft reference a registry use actual values that are registered.

- As no web browser have implemented lookup for the URI RRType (as far as I know), the example should not be using "homepage" as an example, but something else

- Minor clarifications that mostly are editorial

Some of these, but not all, are already implemented in the prematurely posted version -11 which should not have been posted.

Once again, my apologies. Thanks to Eliot, Mark, Suzanne and Pete for helping me.

   Patrik

> On 29 jan 2015, at 08:05, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 29 jan 2015, at 07:59, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Patrik,
>> 
>> On this one point:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1/28/15 9:46 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>> 
>>> The RRType is registered and can not be changed.
>>> 
>>> That said, what can be referred to is a "better" registry for services. IETF do not have a registry for services for SRV. If IETF did, then I would have referenced that registry. I think it is "stupid" to create a new registry.
>> 
>> Stupid or not, it exists.  Go to [1] and select "Service name only".
>> RFC 6335 updated RFC 2782 on this point[2].
> 
> Ok, I have been sleeping by the wheel!
> 
> Mea culpa.
> 
> Let me come back on this.
> 
>   Patrik
> 
>> 
>> Eliot
>> 
>> [1] http://www.iana.org/form/ports-services
>> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]