On 14/02/15 22:47, Mary Barnes wrote: > I do recognize that > quality isn't quite there yet, but it's pretty darn good and maybe good > enough. My experience of being remote was that it was pretty good, but for a lot of the WGs where I listened in, I was able to recognise voices of folks I know, and was also able to use jabber to ask various people there about the goings-on. I don't think that'd be that common for remote participants, and without it, the experience would have been much worse I think. (But it'd be interesting to hear otherwise if that's the case.) And while remote listening (and the occasional prod via jabber) was fairly workable for me, as others have noted I don't think we're anywhere near solving the problem of workable remote input in general. I fully agree that we ought be working more on all of this though. S.