IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385), (continued)
- IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin,
Tony Finch
- As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Eliot Lear
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Sam Hartman
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
John C Klensin
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Ned Freed
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Keith Moore
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
John C Klensin
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Eliot Lear
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Eliot Lear
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Keith Moore
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Dave Cridland
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
John C Klensin
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Thomas Narten
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Sam Hartman
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis,
Bob Braden
Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain),
Frank Ellermann
RE: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 anddraft-newman-i18n-comparator-14,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
25th Anniversary!,
rpelletier
Siemens to Host IETF 67,
rpelletier
Out-of-Office AutoReply: I-D was expired,
Ted Hardie
Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14,
Julian Reschke
RFC/Protocol Quantification,
Sreevathsa
Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683),
Sam Hartman
Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving ...,
Scott Bradner
Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
John C Klensin
IANA XML registries,
JFC Morfin
Re: The BOF wiki,
Dave Crocker
Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries,
JFC Morfin
RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
Gray, Eric
RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
grenville armitage
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
Robert Sayre
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process],
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well.,
todd glassey
Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process,
Noel Chiappa
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Dave Cridland
Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Eliot Lear
<Possible follow-ups>
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Noel Chiappa
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
help,
Sheikh, Usman Fakhar (UMKC-Student)
Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
IPv6 communication,
thekkayil.joy
Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?,
Pekka Savola
Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some,
Noel Chiappa
Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some,
todd glassey
appeals,
JFC Morfin
RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2),
Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test),
Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
RFC Editor RFP Responses,
rpelletier
Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer,
Ted Hardie
Decision to Reset the NomCom Process,
Andrew Lange
RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions),
Sam Hartman
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...,
Keith Moore
Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...,
Jari Arkko
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
what happened to newtrk?,
Eliot Lear
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt),
Brian Carpenter
Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt),
Jefsey_Morfin
IETF Meetings 68 & 69,
rpelletier
www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?,
Tim Chown
Fixing the algorithm,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset,
John Leslie
Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the,
Rick Jelliffe
What is going on with the NOMCOM,
Richard Shockey
Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Richard Shockey
Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Cimbala, Matthew
RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Scott Bradner
Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Scott Bradner
RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Resend: RE: What is going on with the NOMCOM,
Richard Shockey
Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and, variations' to BCP,
Elwyn Davies
I'm looking for Pacific Islanders on the IETF,
Franck Martin
Measurements at IETF65.,
Andrea G Forte
RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for Multicast in L3 Provider-Provisioned VPNs' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts),
benjamin.niven-jenkins
One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812.,
huangxiangkui
[Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps],
Brian E Carpenter
Two other RFCs to be published as Historic (was Re: Expedited Handling Request for draft-ietf-ltru-registry, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, and draft-ietf-ltru-initial),
Jefsey_Morfin
Re: WG Review: Recharter of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru),
Doug Ewell
Deploying v6 was: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Announcement of mailing list for pre-congestion notification (PCN),
Bruce Davie
RE: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz),
Gray, Eric
L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Pekka Savola
Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Elwyn Davies
RE: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Shah, Himanshu
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Noel Chiappa
Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?,
Todd Glassey
Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz),
Sam Hartman
RFP and BCP addition - receipt needs to be generated & RFC's that revise IETF process.,
todd glassey
Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-laganier-ipv6-khi,
julien . laganier
Re: New Version Notification - draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-04.txt,
julien . laganier
draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07,
Brian Suda
Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz),
Frank Ellermann
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IP Storage]
[Linux SCTP]
[IETF]
