Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I would personally find this more useful if it were measured by
> subject line rather than by sender.
>
>   
At the time when these summaries started, it was obvious from some 
summaries that some participants seemed to be spending more time typing 
answers than reading the responses (when one person had two to three 
times as many postings as #2 on the list).

That behaviour has largely disappeared, so it may be less obvious why 
it's a good thing to see this metric.

Personally, I'm for keeping the weekly posting as-is.

                Harald
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Total of 103 messages in the last 7 days.
>>
>> script run at: Fri Apr 18 00:53:01 EDT 2008
>>
>>    Messages   |      Bytes        | Who
>> --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
>>  6.80% |    7 |  5.33% |    37130 | nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  5.83% |    6 |  6.08% |    42351 | brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx
>>  5.83% |    6 |  5.17% |    35998 | henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>     

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]