On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:41:33PM +0300, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx> wrote a message of 46 lines which said: > Rather than providing these types of summaries it would make more > sense to provide a conclusion of the individual discussions. This, > btw, often does not happen in working groups either. As a consequent > nobody knows (after a long discussion) whether there was a > conclusion or what the conclusion could have been. Before trying to summarize the (very open) discussions on the IETF general mailing list, a good start would be to summarize IESG evaluations... I would be interested to know, for instance, why draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch or draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation were not approved by IESG (there is certainly a good reason, but to extract it from datatracker is not obvious). _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf