IETF Discussion

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, (continued)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Clint Chaplin
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Marc Manthey
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Abdussalam Baryun
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
      - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Andy Bierman
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Ted Lemon
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Tim Chown
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, joel jaeggli
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Tim Chown
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, David Morris
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Bob Hinden
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, John C Klensin
        
        ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure (was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), SM
        
        Re: ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure, Andy Bierman
        
        Re: ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: ietf@xxxxxxxx is a failure, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Andy Bierman
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Ulrich Herberg
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Juliao Braga
        
        Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Carlos M. Martinez
        
        Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Arturo Servin
        
        Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Glen Zorn
        
        RE: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], l.wood
        
        Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx], Ray Pelletier
        
        Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Michael Richardson
      - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Noel Chiappa
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, David Morris
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Abdussalam Baryun
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Stewart Bryant
    - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Loa Andersson
    - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Abdussalam Baryun
      - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Hector Santos
      - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, David Morris
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
  - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Abdussalam Baryun
    - Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Patrik Fältström
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Paul Hoffman
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, t.p.
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, Thomas Narten
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx, narten
IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Tony Finch
- Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Jefsey_Morfin
  - Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Theodore Tso
    - Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, Tony Finch
    - Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin, David Kessens
As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Sam Hartman
  - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
    - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Ned Freed
      - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John Leslie
      - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, C. M. Heard
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, bmanning
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-02.txt (was: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis), C. M. Heard
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Message not available
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Keith Moore
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eric Rosen
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, John C Klensin
        
        Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Thomas Narten
    - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Sam Hartman
    - Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Frank Ellermann
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis, Bob Braden
Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Fred Baker
  - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Stig Venaas
      - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Stig Venaas
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Mark Andrews
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Jefsey_Morfin
  - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker
    - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
      - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Bill Fenner
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), David W. Hankins
        
        "zone" is not a DNS name semantic, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: "zone" is not a DNS name semantic, David W. Hankins
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
  - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Matt Larson
    - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Harald Alvestrand
      - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Matt Larson
      - Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Keith Moore
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain), Ralph Droms
RE: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 anddraft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
25th Anniversary!, rpelletier
- References to XML 'documents', Tom.Petch
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Noel Chiappa
- Re: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden
  - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Jeffrey I. Schiller
  - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Dave Crocker
  - Re: 25th Anniversary!, stephen wolff
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: 25th Anniversary!, Bob Braden
  - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis
    - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Ole Jacobsen
      - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Andrew G. Malis
      - Re: 25th Anniversary!, Dave Crocker
Siemens to Host IETF 67, rpelletier
- Re: Siemens to Host IETF 67, Fred Baker
Out-of-Office AutoReply: I-D was expired, Ted Hardie
Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Julian Reschke
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Sam Hartman
- Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Lisa Dusseault
  - Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Arnt Gulbrandsen
  - Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, John C Klensin
    - Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, Harald Alvestrand
    - IDN effort has ballooned in scope without involving relevant additional review, Sam Hartman
  - Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14, bmanning
RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa
- Re: RFC/Protocol Quantification, Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RFC/Protocol Quantification, Sreevathsa
Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Theodore Tso
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), David Kessens
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Sam Hartman
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Dave Crocker
    - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John C Klensin
      - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Steven M. Bellovin
      - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Dave Crocker
        
        the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)), Keith Moore
        
        Re: the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)), Jefsey_Morfin
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John Leslie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Tom.Petch
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Robert Elz
    - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Brian E Carpenter
      - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Robert Elz
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Robert Elz
    - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), John C Klensin
      - Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Ned Freed
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Ned Freed
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' toBCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Tom.Petch
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Robert Elz
- Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683), Harald Alvestrand
Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving ..., Scott Bradner
- Looking forward not back, Sam Hartman
  - Re: Looking forward not back, John C Klensin
Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], John C Klensin
- Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Fred Baker
  - Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
  - Re: Newtrk and ISDs, Frank Ellermann
IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
- BCCed messages, was Re: IANA XML registries, Tony Finch
- Re: IANA XML registries, Peter Dambier
  - Re: IANA XML registries, Jefsey_Morfin
Re: The BOF wiki, Dave Crocker
Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries, JFC Morfin
RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Sam Hartman
- Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Russ Allbery
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Gray, Eric
RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Gray, Eric
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Cridland
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], grenville armitage
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Russ Allbery
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Robert Sayre
      - security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Tony Finch
        
        Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Jeffrey Altman
        
        Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please), Dave Cridland
- Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Henning Schulzrinne
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Dave Crocker
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
        
        Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
        
        Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Sam Hartman
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Spencer Dawkins
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Scott Bradner
Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., todd glassey
- Re: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., Bill Strahm
  - Re: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., Dave Crocker
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Andy Bierman
  - Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey
    - Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an openElection Process, todd glassey
    - Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Theodore Tso
- Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Eliot Lear
    - Re: Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Bill Fenner
  - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Jefsey_Morfin
    - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Frank Ellermann
      - Re: Facts, please, not handwaving, Jefsey_Morfin
  - RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process], Kyse Faril
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Noel Chiappa
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Nelson, David
  - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, todd glassey
RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Message not available
  - RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern
    - RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Yaakov Stein
      - Message not available
        
        RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process, Jefsey_Morfin
    - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, todd glassey
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Dave Cridland
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Eliot Lear
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Message not available
    - RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Joel M. Halpern
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Noel Chiappa
  - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Processratherthansome, todd glassey
- RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
help, Sheikh, Usman Fakhar (UMKC-Student)
Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant
  - Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stephane Bortzmeyer
    - Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages, Stewart Bryant
RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Fred Baker
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
IPv6 communication, thekkayil.joy
Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Pekka Savola
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, todd glassey
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Sam Hartman
  - Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin
  - Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Carl Malamud
    - Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Jefsey_Morfin
      - Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?, Theodore Tso
    - Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Spencer Dawkins
      - Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), todd glassey
        
        Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames), Ted Faber
Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Noel Chiappa
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
  - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Rob Evans
    - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
  - Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Tim Chown
    - Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthan some, todd glassey
    - Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
- Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning
  - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
    - Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...]), Frank Ellermann
      - Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...]), todd glassey
    - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, bmanning
      - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some, todd glassey
      - Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather thansome, Randy Presuhn
        
        Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, todd glassey
        
        Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome, Randy Presuhn
appeals, JFC Morfin
RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed
    - RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Ned Freed
- RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2), George Swallow
Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
RFC Editor RFP Responses, rpelletier
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Stephane Bortzmeyer
  - Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses, Marshall Eubanks
Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer, Ted Hardie
Decision to Reset the NomCom Process, Andrew Lange
RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning
- RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jeffrey Hutzelman
    - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ralph Droms
      - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Pekka Savola
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Sandy Wills
Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
  - Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
    - Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
      - Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Randy Presuhn
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Frank Ellermann
- Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Keith Moore
    - Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
      - Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Robert Sayre
        
        Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions), Jefsey_Morfin
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Stewart Bryant
  - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
    - RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., Fleischman, Eric
      - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here..., todd glassey
    - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore
      - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
        
        Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore
        
        Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Theodore Tso
        
        RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Richard Shockey
  - Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Keith Moore
      - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, John C Klensin
      - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lakshminath Dondeti
    - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Jari Arkko
      - Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Sam Hartman
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Edward Lewis
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Randy Presuhn
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Carl Malamud
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Theodore Tso
        
        Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Ned Freed
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eliot Lear
        
        RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, todd glassey
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, bmanning
        
        Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process, Lars Eggert
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Keith Moore
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Jari Arkko
  - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., Lakshminath Dondeti
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Brian E Carpenter
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
  - RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to belackofcommunicaiton here..., Al Arsenault
RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here..., Noel Chiappa
  - Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here..., todd glassey
what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey
  - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore
    - Re: what happened to newtrk?, todd glassey
      - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Keith Moore
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, C. M. Heard
  - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Eliot Lear
- Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter
    - RE: what happened to newtrk?, Pasi.Eronen
      - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Brian E Carpenter
    - RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?), Alexey Melnikov
    - Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
      - Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin
        
        RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), John C Klensin
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Kurt D. Zeilenga
        
        RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Jeffrey Hutzelman
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
        
        RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
        
        RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Christian Huitema
        
        Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?), Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: RFC 2195, Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: what happened to newtrk?, Frank Ellermann
        
        Re: what happened to newtrk?, Sam Hartman
        
        Re: what happened to newtrk?, John C Klensin

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IP Storage] [Linux SCTP] [IETF]

Powered by Linux