Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stewart,
 
I don't have any problem with the report/reminder only that it has missing important information. The subjects of discussions are not counted, so I counted them. Also the report does not distinguish between general-posting and replying to IETF LCs.
 
AB


On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

AB

Thomas started posting these weekly reports many years
ago as a service to the community to remind us all that
posting to ietf@xxxxxxxx contributes to the information
and work overload of the IETF community as a whole.

The numbers are a reminder to think carefully about what
you send to the list and to only send what you consider
to be sufficiently important that the community as
a whole needs to be aware of it.

Most members of the IETF community  try their best to
minimize their so called "Narten Number". Many
regard these postings as a useful service, and I for
one, thank him for doing it.

- Stewart


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]