IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Mailman request spam exploit
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- RE: Domain Centric Administration
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration)
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux (Multiplexing RTP Data and Control Packets on a Single Port) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Should not URIs be resources and not actions
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-gruu (Obtaining and Using Globally Routable User Agent (UA) URIs (GRUU) in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies
- draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies
- IPv6 transition technologies
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- What about the SMS URI?
- From: Daniel Aleksandersen
- Should not URIs be resources and not actions
- From: Daniel Aleksandersen
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC
- Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-srp (Using SRP for TLS Authentication) to Informational RFC
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? )
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Has anyone looked at the DISCUSS Criteria document lately? (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago))
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- RE: Ietf Digest, Vol 38, Issue 40... Content of IETF digest.
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Udaya V Kumar is out of the office.
- Autoreply: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)]
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments
- On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)]
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- IANA considerations concerns -- specific cases?
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04
- RE: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof forChicago)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 contains new text to address ietf last call comments
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments
- Role of IANA in approving assignments
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Away until June-18: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due]
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...)
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: IANA registration constraints
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- Re: Un-expiring procedural documents
- Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- NDN: [IPFIX] Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow (Bidirectional Flow Export using
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP
- From: Barry Greene (bgreene)
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: IANA registration constraints
- Un-expiring procedural documents
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: IANA registration constraints
- Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus
- RE: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: IANA registration constraints
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list
- Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Type I vs. Type II errors
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: IANA registration constraints
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- IANA considerations and IETF Consensus
- IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...)
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: [Mip4] AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt
- AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt
- Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- Last Call: draft-ietf-dccp-rtp (RTP and the DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Fwd: Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Calendar Adopted with Provisional Regions 2011 - 2013
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- RE: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying NewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- SeND & CGA Extensions BOF
- From: marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- RE: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-applications (Using the HostIdentity Protocol with Legacy Applications) to Experimental RFC
- From: Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (SpecifyingNewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: consensus and anonymity
- RE: On the IETF Consensus process
- consensus and anonymity
- RE: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying NewCongestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- RE: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- Re: [ipv6] 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- Re: [ipv6] 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)
- New IETF Journal available now
- Re: draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- RE: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-applications (Using the Host Identity Protocol with Legacy Applications) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [Hipsec] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-hip-dns (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extensions) to Experimental RFC
- Re: draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt
- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt
- Re: BOF Process
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: BOF Process
- Re: BOF Process
- RE: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills)
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- the Scripts of Softswitch in Network Simulator 2
- Re: Putting IPR on the IETF consensus proccess (was: beware of fake pills)
- Re: BOF Process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-03.txt
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow
- Re: Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP)
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dawkins-nomcom-start-earlier-00.txt
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Putting IPR on IPFIX while the target of IPFIX is to in effect open NetFlow (Was: [IPFIX] Implementation Guidelines // SCTP)
- Re: On the IETF Consensus process
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt (Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms) to BCP
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- On the IETF Consensus process
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- AW: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying LocationObjects in RADIUS
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- AW: IETF last call on RADIUS GEOPRIV Document
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Meeting Calendar 2011 - 2013 #2
- IETF Meeting Host and Sponsor Program
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sip-e2m-sec-05.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: www.ietf.org over IPv6
- RE: www.ietf.org over IPv6
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Re: TLS requirements (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)
- Use Ethernet preamble to perform a frame's classification and a switching optimization
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- RE: [Enum] Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp (ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: www.ietf.org over IPv6
- Re: www.ietf.org over IPv6
- Re: www.ietf.org over IPv6
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- www.ietf.org over IPv6
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-radext-rfc4590bis (RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Design of metalanguages
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call)
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Design of metalanguages (was: Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call)
- RFC Editor Contract Concluded
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Last Call: draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525 (Reclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic) to Historic
- Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib (Ethernet in the First MileCopper (EFMCu) Interfaces MIB) to Proposed Standard
- From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Multimob
- Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Last Call: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib (Ethernet in the First Mile Copper (EFMCu) Interfaces MIB) to Proposed Standard
- tsv-dir review of draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility-03.txt
- [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-spam (The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Spam) to Informational RFC
- RE: RIP unnumbered
- From: Saggioro, GianPietro
- RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage (Multiple Dialog Usages in the Session Initiation Protocol) to Informational RFC
- RE: [Sipping] Last Call: draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage (Multiple Dialog Usages in the Session Initiation Protocol) to Informational RFC
- Re: Cisco Rip Unnumbered Command
- Re: RIP unnumbered
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (fwd)
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Meeting Calendar Update 2011 - 2013
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- Re: IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- IAOC Communications Plan: Review Requested
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-xmpp (IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP') to Proposed Standard
- From: Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-raptor-object (Raptor Forward Error Correction Scheme for Object Delivery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-enum-xmpp (IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP') to Proposed Standard
- Meeting Survey Reminder
- RE: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility) to Informational RFC
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Winterbottom, James
- RE: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Installing glomosim on SuSE
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns (fwd)
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- search engine for IETF and IRTF mailing list archives
- RE: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-inch-iodef (The Incident Object Description Exchange Format) to Proposed Standard
- Installing glomosim on SuSE
- Re: message for ietf-announce: search engine for IETF and IRTF mailing list archives
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-rfc4234bis-00.txt
- Re: message for ietf-announce: search engine for IETF and IRTF mailing list archives
- message for ietf-announce: search engine for IETF and IRTF mailing list archives
- Re: Last Call: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility) to Informational RFC
- AW: [Geopriv] Irregularity at the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs (was: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68)
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs (was: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68)
- From: Jeffrey I. Schiller
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularity at the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularity at the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs
- Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs
- RE: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- ADs speaking for "their" WGs (was: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68)
- Re: Withdrawal of Approval and Second Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns
- Re: Seeking a new IAB Executive Director
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularity at the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- RE: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
- Re: [Geopriv] Irregularities with the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]