Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third Last Call: draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Scott Brim wrote:
On 19 Oct 2007 at 10:30 +1300, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
On 2007-10-19 05:47, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
What I would suggest is that new working groups be required to
specify the governing IPR rules in their charter
...
Violent disagreement. That would make all kinds of a priori
processes kick in for employees of patent-conscious companies,
...

+1

Otherwise you get into battles over theory and ideology without any of
the information you need to make a decision.


+1

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]